There are three basic types of leadership. All of us, with these three styles. Now let me pause here for a minute and say that I'm not saying to change your style. What I propose is that we be flexible with the styles. Do you agree with me that your style of working part time and fails miserably, of the time? Why is it so? Because the style does not fit in every situation. What I propose is that you are using a more flexible, situational leadership, whenThis is leadership styles. Use the style that best of the situation and people involved.
That said, what are the three styles of leadership? The styles are:
1. Autocratic
2. Democrats
3. Vent
Let me explain what each type and when to use it. Autocratic: The autocratic leader is like a general. The commander of an army. They are responsible for decisions and quickwho tell others what to do. We have seen this kind of a lot in the business world in 1950, 1980, over the years. We see it today, but not as much as the previous decades. We see so much in the past? Well, where CEOs and presidents of organizations have received their education? Many of them came from the military. Autocratic leadership style is good for the military? Absolutely. Especially in times of war. Why? Why we are in a crisis or emergency.Decisions must be made quickly and die, or people would be. Autocratic leaders have acted and won the war.
After the war, these leaders are back and have their place in the business world. Discovered that their civilian counterparts out of stock, taking as their military counterparts. This has led to some challenges.
The Heads of State or Government noted that it is not his style to work in every situation. They learned that had to be flexible in their leadership,Styles.
There is still room for autocratic leadership in the corporate world, because we are dealing with emergencies and other situations that make quick decisions and rapid action is required. But what we must do to maximize our effectiveness, is not locked into one style. Use the style that best situation.
Democrats: The second type of leadership style democracy. This is the style of leadership and teamwork. E 'managed byDemocracy. We bring things to a vote, make decisions and the majority rules. This is great for building team spirit and participation, but let me ask a question. Every decision must be made in his office to vote? Of course not. Yes, when it is a good leadership style to use? If you need to get buy-in to respond (through open discussion, where questions and sell your vision) and if decisions are not very important. Use this style to create a report andTeamwork.
Free to run: with this kind of leadership that we get out of the way and let our team do their thing. It is a style in which it is not a micro-management. That's good. The challenge is that team members have an excellent well-trained and do not go getter to be successful. If you do a lot of entry of workers or employees who are new to the mandate, this is not the best style you are in. These workers more with your input and guidance on the need forat least in the short term.
Now that we have.
Three styles of leadership can: authoritarian, democratic and free rein. All have their pros and all have their drawbacks. Use the style, which involved most of the situations and team members, and are found in all situations subsequent leadership.
